Voltar para Artigos
Artigos

SÓCRATES E A PRÁTICA DO EXAME DAS ACUSAÇÕES NO TRIBUNAL ATENIENSE: PERSPECTIVAS FOUCAULTIANAS

Priscila Céspede Cupello

Autor
Priscila Céspede Cupello
Revista
Prometeus - Journal of Philosophy
Edição
40
Ano
2022
DOI
10.52052/issn.2176-5960.pro.v14i40.18393
Idioma
pt
2022Priscila Céspede Cupello. SÓCRATES E A PRÁTICA DO EXAME DAS ACUSAÇÕES NO TRIBUNAL ATENIENSE: PERSPECTIVAS FOUCAULTIANAS. Prometeus - Journal of Philosophy, n. 40, 2022.1

Michel Foucault (1926-1984) when analyzing Plato's Apology of Socrates dialogue states that Socrates does not use rhetoric to defend himself against the accusations received in the Athenian court. He makes no use of a speech aimed at the adulation of the jury by commotion and pity. According to Foucault (2009), the philosopher makes use of frank speech (parresía) and seeks to examine the accusations received in search of the truth and the promotion of justice. Socrates follows his daímon's advice not to prepare a defense speech and practices examining the charges in court. Socrates acts against what was practiced in that space until then, putting his life at risk and being later sentenced to death for poisoning.