Voltar para Artigos
Artigos

The Fallacy of Continuity, on the references to Aristotle in Arendt and Agamben

Liesbeth Huppes-Cluysenaer

Autor
Liesbeth Huppes-Cluysenaer
Revista
ethic@ - An international Journal for Moral Philosophy
Edição
10 / 2
Ano
2011
DOI
10.5007/1677-2954.2011v10n2p223
Páginas
223-253
Idioma
pt
2011Liesbeth Huppes-Cluysenaer. The Fallacy of Continuity, on the references to Aristotle in Arendt and Agamben. ethic@ - An international Journal for Moral Philosophy, v. 10, n. 2, p. 223-253, 2011.1

Agamben characterizes in Homo Sacer the modern state in terms of biopolitics, referring to the theories of Arendt and Foucault. Agamben takes up in this context on a very influential interpretation of Aristotle by Arendt.  Arendt maintains in this reference to Aristotle a false idea of continuity and ignores the fact that – as Foucault shows - at the end of the eighteenth century an inherent connection was established between a completely new type of rationality, governing and the state. There is therefore an ontological difference between the ancient and modern era and this has – as will be shown in this article – far reaching consequences for the key-concepts of Homo Sacer such as bare life, sovereignty and law. The recent development of globalization gives new relevance to this ontological difference, especially by undermining  absolute state-sovereignty.